Before the machine, there was a boy in the pit.
Bowling, as it was played for the first half of the twentieth century, required a human being to stand at the far end of every lane, behind the pins, out of the bowler's line of sight. When the ball came through and the pins went down, he picked them up, put the standing ones back on their spots, cleared the fallen ones aside, and rolled the ball back down the return channel. Then he stood up again and waited for the next one.
He was called a pinsetter, or more commonly a pin boy, and until the late 1940s there was one behind every lane in every alley in the country.
The economics were simple and brutal. Pin boys were usually boys — twelve to eighteen, sometimes younger — hired informally, paid by the game or by the shift, a few cents per game or a small nightly wage with tips from regulars thrown in. The hours followed the customers: evenings and weekends, into the early morning, on the nights when the leagues played.
The work was fast, repetitive and genuinely hazardous. A bowling ball arriving at thirty miles an hour in a confined pit, pins flying, the wooden pin deck slick and moving, an unguarded machine above — injuries in the pits were ordinary rather than exceptional. Boys worked in pairs on busy nights to keep up. Many alleys were loud, smoky and hot, and the pin boys were the youngest people in the building and the least protected.
They also had a culture of their own, which is the part that tends to be left out. Pin boys competed on speed — how fast a pair could clear a rack and get out of the way — and on nerve. They knew the regulars by their approach, by how hard they threw, by whether they left the same split every week. They were a fixed, human feature of the game, and for a certain kind of working-class boy, they were the first job, the first wage, and the first place he learned what a shift felt like.
The machine that ended it was not an overnight arrival. Gottfried Schmidt, an engineer in the United States, built a working automatic pinsetter in the mid-1930s, and could not find anyone to buy it during the Depression. The design was eventually acquired and developed into a commercial product, and after the Second World War the major bowling equipment manufacturers brought automatic pinsetters to market. Alleys that installed them stopped hiring boys. The spread took about a decade, and by the late 1950s the pit behind the pins was, in most of the country, occupied by a machine.
It is not difficult to see why. The machine was faster, never tired, never went home, never got hurt, and worked every lane at once. It also did something subtler: it made the game standardised and quieter. The pace of a frame stopped depending on how quickly a boy could reset the rack. Bowling became a smoother, more uniform product — and the alley stopped being a place where a dozen teenagers were employed all night.
What is worth holding onto is not nostalgia for dangerous child labour. It is the ratio. An entire occupation — with its own skills, its own status hierarchy, its own set of small competences that nobody ever wrote down — was deleted by a device that does exactly one thing better than a boy can. Nobody recorded how the good pin boys were fast; it was never written anywhere, because nobody thought a job that was understood only in the pit was worth documenting.
The scale of it is hard to picture now. Bowling boomed in the United States in the middle of the twentieth century: the postwar decades saw tens of millions of bowlers a year and thousands of alleys, most of them built with lanes in pairs so that one pit and one worker could serve two at once. Run the arithmetic on a busy Saturday night in a forty-lane house — twenty pits, twenty boys, working until two in the morning for a few dollars each — and multiply it across the country, and the pin boys were briefly one of the largest informal employers of teenage labour in America. Most of the people who held the job would not have called it a career. It was what you did after school because an older brother had done it before you.
Automation does not usually remove the work. It removes the people, and takes the undocumented knowledge with them.
https://3026alive.com